![]() ![]() Furthermore, CodeArtifact has a strong limit of one external remote repository (called “external connection”). However, CodeArtifact only supports proxying of official upstream repos: npm – npm.js, Python – PyPI, Maven – Maven Central,, Google Android repository, Gradle plugins repository and CommonsWare Android repository. By these measures, CodeArtifact does not support enough technologies for the diverse needs of most organizations.īoth solutions allow users to proxy external repositories. ![]() Enterprise-level users demand even more, maintaining repos for an average of 12 package types. Our internal data shows that, on average, an Artifactory installation maintains repositories for at least 7 distinct package types. Artifactory also provides a Generic repo type, enabling users to centrally manage additional file types that are part of their releases – such as images, zip files, docs, and more. JFrog Artifactory supports over 30 binaries types. Generally speaking, CodeArtifact does not support multiple snapshot uploads to the same repo – which is a scenario very common across busy development teams, that are building concurrently. Maven support is insufficient for production use: Maven-metadata has to be manually uploaded by clients – which pretty much kills concurrent version deployments for the same package, especially unique snapshots. Let’s examine these 9 key differences: Universal Package ManagementĬodeArtifact is not a universal package manager. It is similar in concept to JFrog’s base-level Artifactory SaaS service offered on the AWS marketplace (and on other public clouds). Comparing AWS CodeArtifact and JFrog ArtifactoryĪWS CodeArtifact is an S3-based managed artifact/binary repository. Let’s dive into the key differences between JFrog Artifactory and AWS CodeArtifact and what these mean for you. Still today, Artifactory is the most popular binary management solution and is the only universal one – supporting over 30 package types, including Docker image registry and Helm repository in one. This new category of tools, that didn’t exist before, became a critical pillar for any development effort. As developers ourselves, we understood the pain of not having a binary manager, so we introduced the industry’s first Artifact Management solution. Below is a comparison of everything you need to know about the differences between JFrog Artifactory and AWS’ CodeArtifact, and which solution best fits common use cases.Īrtifactory – the backbone of the JFrog Platform – was the first product that we introduced to the market. Now, over a decade later, other vendors in the industry are finally starting to catch on.ĪWS announced in 2020 its CodeArtifact service for binary management. Since the inception of JFrog – with OSS Artifactory – we’ve been adamant that you simply cannot deliver software with any type of scale, speed, or reliability without a robust artifact management solution. Update: This blog post has been updated to reflect product offerings as of July 16, 2021 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |